Upcoming event

Association of serum Kidney Injury Molecule (KIM-1) with treatment response and survival in metastatic kidney cancer

  • Akihiro Kumono,
  • Hironori Fukuda,
  • Miyuki Furusawa,
  • Hiroki Ishihara,
  • Kazuhiko Yoshida,
  • Junpei Iizuka,
  • Tsunenori Kondo,
  • Toshio Takagi

Introduction and objectives

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO)-based therapies have improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, reliable blood-based biomarkers that predict treatment response and survival are lacking. Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a tubular injury marker overexpressed in RCC and detectable in serum. We aimed to investigate the association between baseline and on-treatment serum KIM-1 levels and clinical outcomes in mRCC patients receiving IO-based therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients with mRCC who received first-line IO+IO (n = 36) or IO+TKI (n = 37) therapy between 2018 and 2024. Serum KIM-1 was measured at baseline in all patients and at 3 weeks in 63 patients. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to baseline KIM-1 levels. Clinical characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared among groups. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed according to primary tumor status.

Results

Higher baseline KIM-1 was associated with adverse outcomes. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly shorter PFS in the high KIM-1 group compared with the low/intermediate groups (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.15–4.16, p=0.016). In multivariable Cox regression adjusted for IMDC risk, age, and sex, high baseline KIM-1 was not an independent predictor but showed a trend toward worse PFS (HR 2.01, 95% CI 0.98–4.12, p=0.056). Subgroup analysis by primary tumor status revealed that among patients without primary tumors, high baseline KIM-1 was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.15–6.81, p=0.023), whereas in those with primary tumors, baseline KIM-1 levels did not significantly affect PFS. Among 63 patients with paired samples, responders showed a greater KIM-1 decrease than non-responders (median decrease 754 vs 258 pg/mL, p=0.018). Patients with a KIM-1 decrease had a higher ORR, although PFS did not differ significantly between the increase and decrease groups.

Conclusions

These findings support serum KIM-1 as a promising biomarker for predicting therapeutic efficacy in mRCC.

Source of Funding

None